|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
Fecha : |
21/02/2014 |
Actualizado : |
06/11/2018 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Capítulo en Libro Técnico-Científico |
Autor : |
GARCÍA PETILLO, M. |
Afiliación : |
MARIO GARCÍA PETILLO, Uruguay. Universidad de la República (UdelaR). Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Suelos y Aguas. |
Título : |
¿Por qué no regar por gravedad? |
Fecha de publicación : |
2010 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: GRUPO DE DESARROLLO DE RIEGO; SEMINARIO INTERNACIONAL, 1ER. AGOSTO 2010, PAYSANDÚ, URUGUAY. Potencial del riego extensivo en cultivos y pasturas. Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 2010. |
Páginas : |
p. 67-72 |
ISBN : |
978-9974-38-296-1 |
Idioma : |
Español |
Notas : |
Bibliografía: p. 198 |
Thesagro : |
RIEGO EN PASTURAS. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/11833/1/Garcia-M.-2010.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 00561naa a2200157 a 4500 001 1048270 005 2018-11-06 008 2010 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 020 $a978-9974-38-296-1 100 1 $aGARCÍA PETILLO, M. 245 $a¿Por qué no regar por gravedad? 260 $c2010 300 $ap. 67-72 500 $aBibliografía: p. 198 650 $aRIEGO EN PASTURAS 773 $tIn: GRUPO DE DESARROLLO DE RIEGO; SEMINARIO INTERNACIONAL, 1ER. AGOSTO 2010, PAYSANDÚ, URUGUAY. Potencial del riego extensivo en cultivos y pasturas. Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 2010.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
08/04/2020 |
Actualizado : |
08/04/2020 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
AUER, A.; VON BELOW, J.; NAHUELHUAL, L.; MASTRANGELO, M.; GONZÁLEZ, A.; GLUCH, M.; VALLEJOS, M.; STAIANO, L.; LATERRA, P.; PARUELO, J. |
Afiliación : |
A. AUER, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina; EEA Balcarce, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Balcarce, Argentina.; J. VON BELOW, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Instituto de Biología Subtropical (Nodo Iguazú/CONICET), Misiones, Argentina.; L. NAHUELHUAL, Universidad Austral de Chile. Valdivia, Chile; Fundación Bariloche, Prov. de Río Negro, Argentina.; M. MASTRANGELO, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Balcarce, 7620, Argentina.; A. GONZÁLEZ, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina; EEA Balcarce, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Balcarce, Argentina; M. GLUCH, Fundación Bariloche, Prov. de Río Negro, Argentina.; MARÍA VALLEJOS, Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina; INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; L. STAIANO, Fac. Agronomía, Univ. Buenos Aires, Argentina; Lab. Análisis Regional y Teledetección (LART), Inst. Inv. Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA), Fac. Agronomía, Univ. Buenos Aires–CONICET, Bs.As., Argentina.; P. LATERRA, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Balcarce, Argentina.; JOSÉ PARUELO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Mdeo, Uruguay; Depto. Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información, Facultad de Agronomía and IFEVA, UBA and CONICET, Bs.As., Argentina. |
Título : |
The role of social capital and collective actions in natural capital conservation and management. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Environmental Science and Policy, May 2020, Volume 107, Pages 168-178. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.024 |
ISSN : |
1462-9011 |
DOI : |
10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.024 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 24 May 2019; Revised 21 December 2019; Accepted 27 February 2020; Available online 12 March 2020.
Corresponding author: Auer, A.; EEA Balcarce, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Balcarce, Argentina; email:aleauer@gmail.com
Funding text: The following projects funded this study: Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) CRN3 095, which is supported by the US National Science Foundation (Grant GEO-1128040) ; PICT 2016-2150; PICT 2015 0672; FONDECYT 1190207. We want to thank all the interviewers and the interviewees for their valuable help. |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
The relationships among social capital (SC) and collective actions (CA) for nature conservation and management were analyzed across five case studies characterised by specific land-use dynamics in the South American continent. Data on SC and CA were obtained through a semi-structured questionnaire to groups of selected social actors. Multivariate statistical analysis was used to identify SC components and to evaluate SC across actors and cases. The results reaffirm that: i) the multidimensional nature and complexity of SC; ii) Higher levels of SC are related to higher levels of CA; iii) social actors with developed internal and external SC can better counter adverse conditions through CA compared to actors who only have one type of SC; iv) vulnerable social actors do not necessarily have a higher SC or engage in more CA, despite their higher dependence on natural resources; v) those who hold more power or influence in the territory, have higher levels of SC and CA; vi) vulnerable actors often carry out civil/community, economic and judicial actions, while dominant and structuring actors carry out more educational/technical and political actions. Therefore, the formation and maintenance of SC of the most vulnerable actors and those who support them must be a priority for political action, in order to counteract the asymmetric power relations that lead to the exclusion and marginalization of many rural actors. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd |
Palabras claves : |
Ecosystem services; Governance; Social networks; Social-Ecological systems; Stakeholder analysis. |
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
Marc : |
LEADER 03055naa a2200325 a 4500 001 1061018 005 2020-04-08 008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1462-9011 024 7 $a10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.024$2DOI 100 1 $aAUER, A. 245 $aThe role of social capital and collective actions in natural capital conservation and management.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2020 500 $aArticle history: Received 24 May 2019; Revised 21 December 2019; Accepted 27 February 2020; Available online 12 March 2020. Corresponding author: Auer, A.; EEA Balcarce, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Balcarce, Argentina; email:aleauer@gmail.com Funding text: The following projects funded this study: Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) CRN3 095, which is supported by the US National Science Foundation (Grant GEO-1128040) ; PICT 2016-2150; PICT 2015 0672; FONDECYT 1190207. We want to thank all the interviewers and the interviewees for their valuable help. 520 $aABSTRACT. The relationships among social capital (SC) and collective actions (CA) for nature conservation and management were analyzed across five case studies characterised by specific land-use dynamics in the South American continent. Data on SC and CA were obtained through a semi-structured questionnaire to groups of selected social actors. Multivariate statistical analysis was used to identify SC components and to evaluate SC across actors and cases. The results reaffirm that: i) the multidimensional nature and complexity of SC; ii) Higher levels of SC are related to higher levels of CA; iii) social actors with developed internal and external SC can better counter adverse conditions through CA compared to actors who only have one type of SC; iv) vulnerable social actors do not necessarily have a higher SC or engage in more CA, despite their higher dependence on natural resources; v) those who hold more power or influence in the territory, have higher levels of SC and CA; vi) vulnerable actors often carry out civil/community, economic and judicial actions, while dominant and structuring actors carry out more educational/technical and political actions. Therefore, the formation and maintenance of SC of the most vulnerable actors and those who support them must be a priority for political action, in order to counteract the asymmetric power relations that lead to the exclusion and marginalization of many rural actors. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd 653 $aEcosystem services 653 $aGovernance 653 $aSocial networks 653 $aSocial-Ecological systems 653 $aStakeholder analysis 700 1 $aVON BELOW, J. 700 1 $aNAHUELHUAL, L. 700 1 $aMASTRANGELO, M. 700 1 $aGONZÁLEZ, A. 700 1 $aGLUCH, M. 700 1 $aVALLEJOS, M. 700 1 $aSTAIANO, L. 700 1 $aLATERRA, P. 700 1 $aPARUELO, J. 773 $tEnvironmental Science and Policy, May 2020, Volume 107, Pages 168-178. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.024
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|